Tonight we are going to
talk about coffee terroir. Terroir is
often used to describe wine, but it can also be used for coffee. “Terroir”
comes from the French word “terre,” which translates to “ground,” “earth” or
“land.” It encompasses all environmental conditions that affect the final
beverage’s taste. We are also going to taste a lot of coffee, five different
coffees actually. Three of them will be
non-Starbucks coffees.
I am including four
non-Starbucks coffees for a couple reasons: these are coffees we don’t usually
taste, we should educate our palate, and compare the taste of other coffees to
what we are used to. Some say that Starbucks burns their beans in the roasting
process. I have thought about this a great deal, as I don’t agree with that statement. I also checked a number of independent
evaluations of Starbucks coffees. I don’t taste this burnt taste, especially with
medium roast, a Verona, all the Single
Origins and the Reserves. Roasting
coffee is both a science and an art. The
longer a bean is roasted the more the flavor will be from the roasting and not
the country of origin. That’s why the
Reserves are all usually medium roast.
French roast at the extreme end of the roast spectrum is roasted to an
internal temperature of 240C. At 250C
the body of the bean is thin and the taste is characterized by flavors of
charcoal and tar. Also at this temperature the beans are in danger of catching
on fire.
Starbucks roasts a lot of beans. Actually 308
billion beans every year. That works out
to 88 million pounds of coffee beans.
Consistent taste is paramount, when you order a tall Verona in Victoria,
it tastes exactly the same in Miami, in Tokyo and in Melbourne Australia. Also that consistent taste must be true over
numerous growing seasons. That’s why our
core blends are blends and not single origins.
A growing season has unique factors. Often a coffee will taste different
from year to year. A good example is the
Jamaica Blue Mountain. Last year it wasn’t very good and this year while its
still not good it is a little better.
The coffees we are
going to taste this evening are as follows;
The Single Origin Papua New Guinea Highlands, the Reserve California Estate,
Sulawesi Toraja, Monsoon Mallabar from India and Ethiopia Yirgacheffe from the
Adame Garbota Cooperative in the Gedeo region of Ethiopia.
We are going to brew
these coffees using five different brew methods. The V60, the Chemix, the Pour Over, the
French Press,and the Aeropress . We wont
be using the Clover as I want to showcase as many brewing methods as possible. And besides its too easy.
So, lets get back to
terroir, coffee terroir specifically. As I said at the beginning terroir are
all the environmental conditions that influence a beverages final taste For
coffee, these include things like:
soil
annual rainfall
average temperature
amount of sunlight/amount of shade
elevation.
Even less-discussed
factors like the nearby flora and fauna are included in a coffee’s terroir.
Because terroir is
created by a region’s environmental factors, it’s unique to each region.
Terroir is the reason why a coffee from Kenya won’t taste like one from Brazil,
and neither would show the qualities that Sumatra is known for. All of these
countries, and the regions within them, have different growing conditions, so
their coffees have distinct terroirs.
Even the same region’s
terroir may be different from one year to the next. For example, an abnormally
dry or wet growing season could significantly impact how that year’s coffee
matures, which would, in turn, impact how brews made from those coffee beans
taste. Since rainfall is an environmental factor, it is part of the terroir,
and these changes would fall within the term’s scope.
Terroir also can’t be
replicated in a lab setting. So many factors influence a region’s terroir that
it’s impractical, if not impossible, to exactly replicate them in a controlled
experiment. Scientists may be able to isolate one or a few variables, but they
can’t create truly identical growing conditions.
For all its importance,
terroir is just one factor that affects a coffee’s final taste. Processing and
roasting also significantly affect how a coffee tastes, as does brewing. Both
processing and roasting, especially, can significantly impact how much the
terroir of a coffee is emphasized or deemphasized.
Place has long been held as virtually as significant
an element of winemaking as grape variety and processing: When we think of
Burgundy, say, or Champagne, we think as much of the land itself as we do the
famed liquid that come from there. The two are virtually inseparable. Does the
same hold true, however, in coffee?
We know that climate
can and does play a major role in the development of the coffee plant and the
flavors its seeds (or beans) express. Beside simply the soil type and health in
a region or on a farm, the plants are also potentially affected by their access
to water, whether they grow in sunlight or shade, aggressiveness and type of
pruning, and the flora and fauna around them. These things, in turn, will
influence a coffee producer's decisions about processing: When and how the
coffee fruit is removed from its seed, whether or not there will be a
fermentation period, and if that fermentation happens in the open air or under
water—among myriad other choices.
The question is, then,
does terroir so significantly impact the flavor of a coffee that the same
variety grown in two different soils will be distinct enough to the discerning
taster?
It is seemingly
impossible to answer definitively, because it's exceptionally difficult to
re-create non-terroir-related conditions enough among coffee producers to
really compare. However, tasting the same varieties of coffees from neighboring
farms does yield interesting
discoveries.
Is the sweetness
of one coffee caused by the meticulously
ripe picking that a farm staff concentrate on, or is it due to some quality in
the farm's soil? Is the fruity pucker of a Bourbon caused by a different strain of wild yeast
present during fermentation, even though the farm shares the volcanic mountainside
microclimate with other farms.
Is this what makes Hacienda la Esmeralda's Geisha
coffee taste the way it does, the farm itself?
A prime example of the
terroir vs. variety vs. processing debate comes to play in the story of Geisha,
an heirloom type of coffee native to the area around the Ethiopian town of (Gesha), whose plant's descendants have found
themselves rooted in soil in Honduras and, most famously, Panama, among other
places. What's remarkable about the Geisha variety is that it does, in fact,
taste nothing like a coffee from Honduras or Panama, and everything like a
coffee from Ethiopia: Soft, delicate, intensely floral, with lemongrass and
green- or black-tea-like characteristics that caused those first tasting it to
wonder if they'd been duped.
Would a Geisha planted,
say, in Brazil have the same characteristics, though? What about Sumatra? How
close does the climate need to be in order to transfer the qualities of the
variety from one plot of land to another? Or is there something else at play
here?
Usually, changes in
terroir seem to bring about great changes in the plants themselves: Moving a
variety from a lush, green clime to a more arid one usually does cause distinct
changes in the cup profile, and many subvarities have been born through natural
mutation likely spawned by transplanting. Additionally, in many growing
regions, producers follow generally similar processing practices that will
impart specific flavors to the coffees grown there, which we might associate
with location but in fact relates more to technique than topsoil.
“Terroir in coffee typically alludes to a selection
of country, region, variety, altitude, crop cycle, soil, weather, and
processing. Terroir for coffee is the
accumulative effect origin.”
All the specifics from origin come into play with
terroir. The Brazilian Córrego Lavrinhas coffee is grown at 900 meters, which
in a vacuum could imply lower quality, however with the unique micro-climate, it
doesn’t truly represent what to expect from a lower altitude coffee.
When you compare two
coffees it brings up even more questions. The two coffees are grown on farms
located 2km apart, they are produced by the same farmer and processed at the
same mill, yet regardless of the proximity and producing similarities, they’re
quite far apart in taste.
“Vendeval means weather
where it’s windy and misty rain… that kind of storm that’s not full rain, but
not just mist, that very specific light rain. It gets the two weather systems
colliding right where it’s from the Atlantic and the Pacific. It gets this very
different weather at the top of the mountain, because there’s a little bit of
influence from the other side, which is the last break before it’s just in the
Atlantic side. Guatemala, my second favorite coffee country is a good example
of this. Guatemala has seven separate and distinct coffee regions. Each has
unique weather systems. Our core
Guatemala Antigua coffee is grown in the south west part of the country, which
is heavily influenced by the Pacific Ocean, The Reserve Yaxbatz is grown in the
eastern region, in a region which features the heaviest rainfall, it is also
influenced by the Atlantic Ocean, Huehuetenango is grown in a region bordering
Mexico and is heavily influenced by the hot and dry winds of Mexico’s Tehuantepec
plain.
Terroir, is too particular to be meaningful on the
level of country. Countries are just too variable in geography and climate to
be thought of singularly. For example, Brazil—one of the world’s largest coffee
producers—contains rainforests, mountains, grasslands, and swamps. In fact, terroir is so specific that even
narrower parameters like climate or geography are shaky. Terroir is
microclimate: altitude, soil quality, temperature, humidity, access to
sunlight. Slight modifications to any of these variables will affect the
eventual profile of the coffee, even when coffee plants of the same species are
grown on the same farm, in the same region, in the same country.
Its not just about
space, its also about time. Changes in weather over the course of a year, or
from year to year, can have a huge effect on coffee’s flavor. Everything can be
perfect as far as processing and roasting but as far as this time next year,
what that’s gonna taste like, that’s a different story.
Does this mean that
geography is a useless way of thinking about coffee? Not exactly. Generally,
there are discernible differences between coffee beans from various regions—but
they’re very broad. “African coffees tend to be light in body, but they’re
bright. Latin American coffee tends to fall between Asian coffee and Indonesian
and Indian coffee, which tend to be full in body and light in acidity.
You certainly are going
to find, very generally speaking, a certain kind of flavor in East Africa, certainly
Ethiopia. You’re going to find a certain
flavor in India, in southeast Asia. That’s not in anyone’s imagination, those
are real differences.
To find coffee that you
like on its own terms, it’s best to ignore country of origin and instead
educate yourself about the different flavor profiles coffee can have. This may
seem shortsighted considering how many processes occur before coffee reaches
you—growing, picking, processing,
bagging, shipping, roasting, grinding, then brewing—but it’s precisely how
roasters hone in on what flavors a particular terroir has produced.
By identifying which of
these flavors you prefer in your coffee, you can discover what kind of coffee
you really like, and learn why particular regions produce such distinct flavors
(thus learning more about those places in the process). You’ll ascertain the
differences between roasts, you’ll glean which flavors you dislike and you’ll be able to get your fill even when
your preferred cultivar is out of season or when you find yourself at a new
coffee shop.
This will probably feel
like a relinquishing of power if you’re already convinced that you know,
definitively, how you like your coffee and where that coffee comes from. But
it’s really a refinement. It’s preposterous to take a phrase like Ethiopian
coffee seriously when Ethiopia is over 426,000 square miles and contains
volcanoes and floodplains and highlands—all of which can accommodate coffee
plants. A true appreciator of coffee terroir would locate that one hectare of
land that speaks to you and, while you can, appreciate it. It might not be
around next year.
No comments:
Post a Comment